4.4.2E: Mating Systems and Sexual Selection - Biology

4.4.2E: Mating Systems and Sexual Selection - Biology

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

In mating, there are two types of selection (intersexual, intrasexual) and three mating systems (monogamous, polygynous, polyandrous).

Learning Objectives

  • Differentiate among monogamous, polygynous, and polyandrous mating systems, and distinguish between intersexual and intrasexual mate selection

Key Points

  • Two types of mate selection occur: intersexual selection (the choice of a mate where individuals of one sex choose mates of the other sex) and intrasexual selection (the competition for mates between species members of the same sex).
  • Three general mating systems, all involving innate as opposed to learned behaviors, are seen in animal populations: monogamous ( monogamy ), polygynous ( polygyny ), and polyandrous (polyandry).
  • In monogamous systems, one male and one female are paired for at least one breeding season; although in some animals, these partnerships can last even longer, sometimes an entire lifetime; males provide substantial parental care.
  • Polygynous mating refers to one male mating with multiple females; in these situations, the female must be responsible for most of the parental care as the single male is not capable of providing care to that many offspring.
  • In polyandrous mating systems, one female mates with many males; these types of systems are much rarer than monogamous and polygynous mating systems.

Key Terms

  • polyandry: the mating pattern whereby a female copulates with several males
  • polygyny: the mating patterns whereby a male copulates with several females
  • monogamy: a form of sexual bonding involving an exclusive pair bond between two individuals

Finding Sexual Partners

Not all animals reproduce sexually, but many that do have the same challenge: they need to find a suitable mate and often have to compete with other individuals to obtain one. Significant energy is spent in the process of locating, attracting, and mating with a sex partner.

Types of Mate Selection

Two types of selection that occur during the process of choosing a mate may be involved in the evolution of reproductive traits called secondary sexual characteristics. These types are: intersexual selection (the choice of a mate where individuals of one sex choose mates of the other sex) and intrasexual selection (the competition for mates between species members of the same sex). Intersexual selection is often complex because choosing a mate may be based on a variety of visual, aural, tactile, and chemical cues. An example of intersexual selection is when female peacocks choose to mate with the male with the brightest plumage. This type of selection often leads to traits in the chosen sex that do not enhance survival, but are those traits most attractive to the opposite sex (often at the expense of survival). Intrasexual selection involves mating displays and aggressive mating rituals such as rams butting heads; the winner of these battles is the one that is able to mate. Many of these rituals use up considerable energy, but result in the selection of the healthiest, strongest, and/or most dominant individuals for mating.

Mating Systems

Three general mating systems, all involving innate as opposed to learned behaviors, are seen in animal populations: monogamous (monogamy), polygynous (polygyny), and polyandrous (polyandry).

In monogamous systems, one male and one female are paired for at least one breeding season. In some animals, such as the gray wolf, these associations can last much longer, even a lifetime. Several explanations have been proposed for this type of mating system. The “mate-guarding hypothesis” states that males stay with the female to prevent other males from mating with her. This behavior is advantageous in such situations where mates are scarce and difficult to find. Another explanation is the “male-assistance hypothesis,” where males that remain with a female to help guard and rear their young will have more and healthier offspring. Monogamy is observed in many bird populations where, in addition to the parental care from the female, the male is also a major provider of parental care for the chicks. A third explanation for the evolutionary advantages of monogamy is the “female-enforcement hypothesis.” In this scenario, the female ensures that the male does not have other offspring that might compete with her own, so she actively interferes with the male’s signaling to attract other mates.

Polygynous mating refers to one male mating with multiple females. In these situations, the female must be responsible for most of the parental care as the single male is not capable of providing care to that many offspring. In resourced-based polygyny, males compete for territories with the best resources. They then mate with females that enter the territory, drawn to its resource richness. The female benefits by mating with a dominant, genetically-fit male; however, it is at the cost of having no male help in caring for the offspring. An example is seen in the yellow-rumped honeyguide, a bird whose males defend beehives because the females feed on the wax. As the females approach, the male defending the nest will mate with them. Harem mating structures are a type of polygynous system where certain males dominate mating while controlling a territory with resources. Elephant seals, where the alpha male dominates the mating within the group, are an example. A third type of polygyny is a lek system. Here there is a communal courting area where several males perform elaborate displays for females; the females choose their mate from this group. This behavior is observed in several bird species.

In polyandrous mating systems, one female mates with many males. These types of systems are much rarer than monogamous and polygynous mating systems. In pipefishes and seahorses, males receive the eggs from the female, fertilize them, protect them within a pouch, and give birth to the offspring. Therefore, the female is able to provide eggs to several males without the burden of carrying the fertilized eggs.

4.4.2E: Mating Systems and Sexual Selection - Biology

The mating systems of medically important mosquitoes are characterized by aerial swarms, within which many complex behaviors unfold.

Evidence suggests that females mate once, whereas males can mate multiply.

This combined with swarms that consist of many more males than females generates intense mating competition between males and allows females to be choosy.

A lack of data on male and female sexually selected traits and evolutionary relationships between them are a key knowledge gap in these systems.

A comprehensive understanding of mosquito mating biology is essential for the development and successful deployment of reproductive control methods.

The field of mosquito mating biology has experienced a considerable expansion in the past decade. Recent work has generated many key insights about specific aspects of mating behavior and physiology. Here, we synthesize these findings and classify swarming mosquito systems as polygynous. Male mating success is highly variable in swarms and evidence suggests that it is likely determined by both scramble competition between males and female choice. Incorporating this new understanding will improve both implementation and long-term stability of reproductive control tools.

Recent courses

Seminars in Ecology and Evolution

What: At least once a week there are seminars from researchers in ecology or evolution. These seminars are given by local people and by visitors. This semester there are also a number of presentations by job candidates. The point of these seminars is to learn about exciting research. What questions are they asking? What are they discovering? What new scientific stories can we hear about ecology or evolution? What makes up these fields anyway? The seminars are often followed by receptions which are a chance to get to know each other better and to ask questions. This course invites undergraduates to listen to these presentations and write about them. After all, this is a major part of the ideas climate at Wash U. It would be a great idea to get in the habit of going to seminars, with this course, or without. In addition to attending seminars, we will meet three times during the semester, early on and a couple of times later. When: Most seminars are 4:00 on Thursdays, though some are on other days. The three meetings will be arranged at a time that works for the students in the course.

Behavioral Ecology

This course examines animal behavior from an evolutionary perspective and explores the relationships between animal behavior, ecology, and evolution. Topics include mating systems, sexual selection, parental care, kin selection, and cooperation. There is a strong active - learning component.

Barker DG, Barker TM (1994) Pythons of the world, vol I, Australia. Herpetocultural Library, San Francisco

Charles N, Field R, Shine R (1985) Notes on the reproductive biology of Australian pythons, genera Aspidites, Liasis and Morelia. Herpetol Rev 16:45–48

Cogger HG (1992) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 4th edn. Reed Books, Sydney

Covacevich J (1975) Shakes in combat. Vict Nat 92:252–253

Cowan DP, Bell DJ (1988) Leporid social behaviour and social organisation. Mammal Rev 16:169–179

Crook JH (1970) The socio-ecology of primates. In: Crook JH (ed), Social behaviour in birds and mammals. Academic Press, London, pp 103–166

Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

Duvall D, Schuett G, Arnold SJ (1992) Pitviper mating systems: ecological potential, sexual selection and microevolution. In: Campbell JA, Brodie EDJ (eds) Biology of the pitvipers. Selva, Tyler, Texas, pp 321–336

Duvall D, Schuet GW, Arnold SJ (1993) Ecology and evolution of snake mating sytems. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT (eds) Snakes: ecology and behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 165–200

Ehmann H (1992) Encyclopedia of Australian animals. Reptiles. Angus and Robertson, Sydney

Fleay D (1960) Talking of animals. Jacaranda Press, Brisbane

Fricke HW (1977) Community structure, social organisation and ecological requirements of coral reef fish (Pomacentridae). Holgander Wiss Meeresunters 30:412–416

Gibbons JW (1972) Reproduction, growth and sexual dimorphism in the canebrake rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus atricaudatus). Copeia 1972:222–227

Hammond S (1988) Morelia spilota variegata. Male combat. Herpetol Rev 19:37

Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology (Oxford studies in ecology and evolution). Oxford University Press, Oxford

Hoser RT (1980) Further records of aggregation of various species of Australian snakes. Herpetofauna 12:16–22

Howard RD (1981) Sexual dimorphism in bullfrogs. Ecology 62:303–310

Kluge AG (1993) Aspidites and the phylogeny of pythonine snakes. Rec Aust Mus Suppl 19:1–77

Lott DF (1991) Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

M'Closkey RT, Baia KA, Russell RW (1987) Tree lizard (Urosaurus ornatus) territories: experimental peturbation of the ratio. Ecology 68:2059–2062

Madsen T, Shine R (1993) Temporal variability in sexual selection acting on reproductive tactics and body size in male snakes. Am Nat 141:167–171

Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Håkansson T (1993) Determinants of mating success in male adders, Vipera berus. Anim Behav 45:491–499

Manzur MI, Fuentes ER (1979) Polygyny and agonistic behavior in the tree-dwelling lizard Liolaemus tenuis (Iguanidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:23–28

Mihok S (1979) Behavioral structure and demography of subarctic Clethrionomys gapperi and Peromyscus maniculatus. Can J Zool 57:1520–1535

Perry-Richardson J (1991) Chondropython viridis (Green tree python). Combat fatality. Herpetol Rev 22:100

Ralls K (1976) Mammals in which females are larger than males. Q Rev Biol 51:245–276

Ross RA, Marzec G (1990) The reproductive biology of pythons and boas. Institute for Herpetological Research, Stanford

Ruby DE, Baird DI (1994) Intraspecific variation in behavior: comparisons between populations at different altitudes of the lizard Sceloporus jarrovi. J Herpetol 28:70–78

Schwaner TD, Francis M, Harvey C (1988) Identification and conservation of carpet pythons (Morelia spilota imbricata) on St. Francis Island, South Australia. Herpetofauna 18:13–20

Schwaner TD, Sarre SD (1990) Body size and sexual dimorphism in mainland and island tiger snakes. J Herpetol 24:320–322

Seghers BH (1974) Schooling behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): an evolutionary response to predation. Evolution 28:486–489

Seigel RA, Ford NB (1987) Reproductive ecology. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT, Novak SS (eds) Snakes: ecology and evolutionary biology. Macmillan, New York, pp 210–252

Shine R (1978) Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia 33:269–278

Shine R (1990) Proximate determinants of sexual differences in adult body size. Am Nat 135:278–283

Shine R (1994) Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994:326–346

Shine R (1995) The biology and management of diamond pythons (Morelia s. spilota) and carpet pythons (M. s. variegata) (Species management report). New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney

Shine R, Slip DJ (1990) Biological aspects of the adaptive radiation of Australasian pythons (Serpentes: Boidae). Herpetologica 46:283–290

Simmons R, Barnard P, MacWhirter B, Hansen GL (1986) The influence of microtines on polygyny, productivity, age and provisioning of breeding northern harriers: a 5-year study. Can J Zool 64:2447–2456

Slip DJ, Shine R (1988a) The reproductive biology and mating system of diamond pythons, Morelia spilota (Serpentes, Biodae). Herpetologica 44:396–404

Slip DJ, Shine R (1988b) Habitat use, movements and activity patterns of free-ranging diamond pythons, Morelia s. spilota (Serpentes: Biodae): a radiotelemetric study. Aust Wildl Res 15:515–531

Slip DJ, Shine R (1988c) Reptilian endothermy: a field study of thermoregulation by brooding diamond pythons. J Zool Lond 216:367–378

Slip DJ, Shine R (1988d) Thermoregulation of free-ranging diamond pythons, Morelia spilota (Serpentes, Boidae). Copeia 1988:984–995

Slip DJ, Shine R (1988e) Feeding habits of the diamond python, Morelia s. spilota: ambush predation by a boid snake. J Herpetol 22:323–330

Taylor AB (1988) Adaptive variation in rheotactic and agonistic behavior in newly emerged fry of chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, from ocean-and stream-type populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:237–243

Vandermark J (1989) Communal mating of diamond pythons. ACT Herpetol Assoc Newsletter March 1989:10–12

Webber P (1978) A note on an aggregation of diamond pythons, Morelia s. spilotes in the Grose Valley NSW. Herpetofauna 10:25–26

Special feature paper: Humans as a model for understanding biological fundamentals.

Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.


. 1871 The descent of man and selection in relation to sex . New York, NY : The Modern Library . Google Scholar

. 1892 Note on sexual selection . Nat. Sci. 1, 749–750. Google Scholar

. 2012 Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin's really dangerous idea . Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2253–2265. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0285) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2006 Sexual selection and mate choice . Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 296–302. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2015 The evolution of sexuality . New York, NY : Springer . Crossref, Google Scholar

. 1998 How mate choice shaped human nature: a review of sexual selection and human evolution . In Handbook of evolutionary psychology (eds

), pp. 87–129. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum . Google Scholar

Grammer K, Fink B, Moller AP, Thornhill R

. 2003 Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty . Biol. Rev. 78, 385–407. (doi:10.1017/s1464793102006085) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2006 Sexual selection and the evolution of human sex differences . Psychol. Topics 15, 203–238. Google Scholar

Dixson BJ, Duncan M, Dixson AF

. 2015 The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women's sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age . Arch. Sex. Behav. 44, 1685–1695. (doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0516-2) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1998 The nubility hypothesis: the human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value . Hum. Nat. 9, 263–271. (doi:10.1007/s12110-998-1005-2) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

Dixson BJW, Rantala MJ, Melo EF, Brooks RC

. 2017 Beards and the big city: displays of masculinity may be amplified under crowded conditions . Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 259–264. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.009) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1993 Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 293–307. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2015 The functional design and phylogeny of women's sexuality . In The evolution of sexuality (eds

), pp. 149–184. Berlin, Germany : Springer International Publishing . Google Scholar

. 2005 The evolution of human physical attractiveness . Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34, 523–548. (doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733) Crossref, Google Scholar

Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I

. 2004 Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women . Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 1213–1217. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2712) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2015 Protective buttressing of the hominin face . Biol. Rev. 90, 330–346. (doi:10.1111/brv.12112) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

Sell A, Cosmides L, Tooby J

. 2014 The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength . Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 425–429. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.008) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2010 Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans . Evol. Hum. Behav. 31, 157–175. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

Gallup GG, Burch RL, Zappieri ML, Parvez RA, Stockwell ML, Davis JA

. 2003 The human penis as a semen displacement device . Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 277–289. (doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(03)00016-3) Crossref, Google Scholar

Simmons LW, Firman RC, Rhodes G, Peters M

. 2004 Human sperm competition: testis size, sperm production and rates of extrapair copulations . Anim. Behav. 68, 297–302. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.013) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1993 Human sperm competition—ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm . Anim. Behav. 46, 887–909. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1272) Crossref, Google Scholar

Haselton MG, Mortezaie M, Pillsworth EG, Bleske-Rechek A, Frederick DA

. 2007 Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: near ovulation, women dress to impress . Horm. Behav. 51, 40–45. (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Griskevicius V, Cialdini RB, Kenrick DT

. 2006 Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: the effects of romantic motives on creativity . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 63–76. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.63) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2000 Evolution of human music through sexual selection . In The origins of music (eds

Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S

), pp. 329–360. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press . Google Scholar

Kaufman SB, Kozbelt A, Bromley ML, Miller GF

. 2008 The role of creativity and humor in human mate selection . In Mating intelligence: sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (eds

), pp. 227–262. New York, NY : Lawrence Erlbaum . Google Scholar

Faurie C, Pontier D, Raymond M

. 2004 Student athletes claim to have more sexual partners than other students . Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 1–8. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00064-3) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2007 Mating games: cultural evolution and sexual selection . Biol. Philos. 22, 475–491. (doi:10.1007/s10539-006-9041-y) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2005 Whither model organism research? Science 307, 1885–1886. (doi:10.1126/science.1108872) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila . Heredity 2, 349–368. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1956 Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura . J. Genet. 54, 261. (doi:10.1007/bf02982781) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2005 Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution , p. 342. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press . Google Scholar

. 1994 The language instinct , p. 493. New York, NY : William Morrow and Company . Google Scholar

. 2012 World without weight: perspectives on an alien mind , p. 374. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press . Google Scholar

. 2015 Preferred women's waist-to-hip ratio variation over the last 2,500 years . PLoS ONE 10, e0123284. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123284) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

Gottschall J, Martin J, Quish H, Rea J

. 2004 Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature . Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 102–112. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00007-8) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2008 Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment . Evol. Psychol. 6, 135–146. (doi:10.1177/147470490800600116) Crossref, Google Scholar

Shackelford TK, Schmitt DP, Buss DM

. 2005 Universal dimensions of human mate preferences . Pers. Indiv. Differ. 39, 447–458. (doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2011 A billion wicked thoughts: what the Internet tells us about sexual relationships . Baltimore, MD : Penguin . Google Scholar

. 1992 Roman polygyny . Ethol. Sociobiol. 13, 309–349. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(92)90008-R) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 1992 Roman monogamy . Ethol. Sociobiol. 13, 351–383. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(92)90009-S) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2008 Rape of Troy: evolution, violence, and the world of Homer , pp. 1–223. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press . Google Scholar

Courtiol A, Pettay JE, Jokela M, Rotkirch A, Lummaa V

. 2012 Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 109, 8044–8049. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1118174109) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2017 The impact of parental investment on lifetime reproductive success in Iceland . PeerJ 5, 17. (doi:10.7717/peerj.2904) Crossref, Google Scholar

2008 The population reference sample, popres: a resource for population, disease, and pharmacological genetics research . Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 347–358. (doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.005) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2006 Is the chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes, an endangered species? It depends on what ‘endangered’ means . Primates 47, 102–112. (doi:10.1007/s10329-005-0149-5) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2015 Evolutionary contributions to the study of human fertility . Popul. Stud. J. Demogr. 69, S39–S55. (doi:10.1080/00324728.2014.982905) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2002 Natural selection and social theory: selected papers of Robert Trivers . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press . Google Scholar

. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection . In Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (ed.

), pp. 136–179. London, UK : Heinemann . Google Scholar

. 2016 Rethinking Bateman's principles: challenging persistent myths of sexually reluctant females and promiscuous males . J. Sex. Res. 53, 532–559. (doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1150938) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 1977 Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems . Science 197, 215–223. (doi:10.1126/science.327542) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ

. 1991 Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females . Nature 351, 58–60. (doi:10.1038/351058a0) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Gowaty PA, Kim YK, Anderson WW

. 2012 No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11 740–11 745. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1207851109) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2016 The evolution of expenditure on testes . J. Zool. 298, 3–19. (doi:10.1111/jzo.12297) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

Janicke T, Haderer IK, Lajeunesse MJ, Anthes N

. 2016 Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom . Sci. Adv. 2, 10. (doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500983) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2016 Lies, damned lies, and survey self-reports? Identity as a cause of measurement bias . Soc. Psychol. Q. 79, 333–354. (doi:10.1177/0190272516628298) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A

. 2010 The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2002 Alas poor evolutionary psychology: unfairly accused, unjustly condemned . Hum. Nat. Rev. 2, 99–109. Google Scholar

. 1968 The evolution of hunting . In Man the hunter (eds

), pp. 193–303. Chicago, IL : Aldine Press . Google Scholar

. 2017 Evolution of the human mating system . In Chimpanzees and human evolution (eds

Muller MN, Wrangham RW, Pilbeam DR

). Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press . Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2013 Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure . Evol. Anthropol. 22, 52–65. (doi:10.1002/evan.21345) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2013 Evolution and human sexuality . Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 152, 94–118. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.22394) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 1979 The evolution of human sexuality . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press . Google Scholar

. 2003 Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 85. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.85) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 1986 Despotism and differential reproduction: a Darwinian view of history . New York, NY : Aldine Publishing Company . Google Scholar

. 1997 Raising Darwin's consciousness—female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy . Hum. Nat.-Interdiscip. Biosoc. Perspect. 8, 1–49. (doi:10.1007/s12110-997-1003-9) PubMed, Google Scholar

. 1979 Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection, as illustrated by man and the great apes . In Advances in the study of behavior (eds

Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Beer C, Busnel MC

). New York, NY : Academic Press . Google Scholar

. 1967 The naked ape: a zoologist's study of the human animal . New York, NY : McGraw Hill . Google Scholar

Sayers K, Raghanti MA, Lovejoy CO

. 2012 Human evolution and the chimpanzee referential doctrine . In Annual review of anthropology , vol. 41 (eds

), pp. 119–138. Palo Alto, CA : Annual Reviews . Google Scholar

. 2012 The importance of physical strength to human males . Hum. Nat.-Interdiscip. Biosoc. Perspect. 23, 30–44. (doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2) PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2010 Sex at dawn: the prehistoric origins of modern sexuality . New York, NY : Harper . Google Scholar

. 2016 Out of Eden: the surprising consequences of polygamy . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press . Google Scholar

Dixson AF, Dixson BJ, Anderson M

. 2005 Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes, and human beings . Annu. Rev. Sex. Res. 16, 1–19. PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2013 Non-monogamous copulations and potential within-group mating competition in white-faced saki monkeys (Pithecia pithecia) . Am. J. Primatol. 75, 817–824. (doi:10.1002/ajp.22142) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2010 Maintenance of multifemale social organization in a group of Nomascus concolor at Wuliang Mountain, Yunnan, China . Int. J. Primatol. 31, 1–13. (doi:10.1007/s10764-009-9375-9) Crossref, Google Scholar

Grueter CC, Isler K, Dixson BJ

. 2015 Are badges of status adaptive in large complex primate groups? Evol. Hum. Behav. 36, 398–406. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.03.003) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

Grueter CC, Chapais B, Zinner D

. 2012 Evolution of multilevel social systems in nonhuman primates and humans . Int. J. Primatol. 33, 1002–1037. (doi:10.1007/s10764-012-9618-z) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2012 A papionin multilevel society as a model for hominin social evolution . Int. J. Primatol. 33, 1165–1193. (doi:10.1007/s10764-012-9600-9) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2009 Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity . Evol. Hum. Behav. 30, 322–328. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.04.002) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 2000 Paternal investment and the human mating system . Behav. Processes 51, 45–61. (doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00118-2) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Larmuseau MHD, Matthijs K, Wenseleers T

. 2016 Cuckolded fathers rare in human populations . Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 327–329. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.004) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2006 How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Evidence from worldwide nonpaternity rates . Curr. Anthropol. 47, 513–520. (doi:10.1086/504167) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2003 The mating system of foragers in the standard cross-cultural sample . Cross-Cult. Res. 37, 282–306. (doi:10.1177/1069397103254008) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 1996 Costs and benefits of monogamy and polygyny for Yanomamo women . Ethol. Sociobiol. 17, 181–199. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9) Crossref, Google Scholar

Walker RS, Flinn MV, Hill KR

. 2010 Evolutionary history of partible paternity in lowland South America . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19 195–19 200. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1002598107) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2005 This is my partner, and this is my partner's partner: constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world . J. Constr. Psychol. 18, 75–88. (doi:10.1080/10720530590523107) Google Scholar

Garcia JR, Reiber C, Massey SG, Merriwether AM

. 2012 Sexual hookup culture: a review . Rev. Gen. Psychol. 16, 161. (doi:10.1037/a0027911) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar

. 2010 Primeval kinship: how pair-bonding gave birth to human society , p. 368. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press . Google Scholar

Rodseth L, Wrangham RW, Harrigan AM, Smuts BB

. 1991 The human community as a primate society . Curr. Anthropol. 32, 221–254. (doi:10.1086/203952) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2005 Hunter-gatherers and human evolution . Evol. Anthropol. 14, 54–67. (doi:10.1002/evan.20046) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2012 Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9923–9928. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1200717109) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2013 The evolution of social monogamy in mammals . Science 341, 526–530. (doi:10.1126/science.1238677) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2016 Beyond the nuclear family: an evolutionary perspective on parenting . Curr. Opin. Psychol. 7, 98–103. (doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.013) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2012 Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence . Evol. Hum. Behav. 33, 309–317. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.008) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

Dubuc C, Ruiz-Lambides A, Widdig A

. 2014 Variance in male lifetime reproductive success and estimation of the degree of polygyny in a primate . Behav. Ecol. 25, 878–889. (doi:10.1093/beheco/aru052) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Setchell JM, Charpentier M, Wickings EJ

. 2005 Sexual selection and reproductive careers in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) . Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 474–485. (doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0946-2) Crossref, Google Scholar

Alexander RD, Hoogland JL, Howard RD, Noonan KM, Sherman PW

. 1979 Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans . In Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: an anthropological perspective (eds

), pp. 402–435. North Scituate, MA : Duxbury Press . Google Scholar

. 1995 The establishment and maintenance of socially imposed mongamy in Western Europe . Politics Life Sci. 14, 3–23. (doi:10.1017/S0730938400011679) Crossref, Google Scholar

Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ

. 2012 The puzzle of monogamous marriage . Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 657–669. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0290) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

. 2010 Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness . J. Evol. Biol. 23, 149–156. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1980 The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice and sperm precedence . Anim. Behav. 28, 446–461. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80052-2) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1988 Reproductive success of three Kipsigis cohorts . In Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems (ed.

), pp. 419–438. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press . Google Scholar

. 1990 Mate choice near or far . Am. Zool. 30, 341–352. (doi:10.1093/icb/30.2.341) Crossref, Google Scholar

. 1982 Heritable true fitness and bright birds—a role for parasites . Science 218, 384–387. (doi:10.1126/science.7123238) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

. 1994 The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity . Evolution 48, 1089–1100. (doi:10.2307/2410369) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Sexual Selection: A Very Short Introduction

Sexual Selection: A Very Short Introduction introduces the astounding array of behaviours and decorative traits in the animal world used for competing for mates, and considers the evolutionary logic that underpins them. It also looks at the history of our understanding of sexual selection, from Darwin’s key insights to the modern day. Considering the investment animals place on reproduction, variation in mating systems, sexual conflict, and the origin of sexual dimorphism, it discusses questions such as whether females can really choose between males on aesthetic grounds, and how sexual conflict is resolved in different species. It concludes with a consideration of the thorny question of how, and even if, sexual selection theory applies to humans.

Bibliographic Information


Marlene Zuk, author Professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Author Webpage

Leigh W. Simmons, author Professor in the School of Animal Biology at the University of Western Australia, and Director of the UWA Centre for Evolutionary Biology
Author Webpage

The lek mating system of the worm pipefish (Nerophis lumbriciformis): a molecular maternity analysis and test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis

The origin and maintenance of mating preferences continues to be an important and controversial topic in sexual selection research. Leks and lek-like mating systems, where individuals gather in particular spots for the sole purpose of mate choice, are particularly puzzling, because the strong directional selection imposed by mate choice should erode genetic variation among competing individuals and negate any benefit for the choosing sex. Here, we take advantage of the lek-like mating system of the worm pipefish (Nerophis lumbriciformis) to test the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis for the maintenance of mating preferences. We use microsatellite markers to perform a parentage analysis, along with a mark-recapture study, to confirm that the worm pipefish has an unusual mating system that strongly resembles a female lek, where females display and males visit the lek to choose mates. Our results show that the most highly ornamented females occupy positions near the centre of the breeding area, and males mating with these females receive fuller broods with larger eggs compared to males mating with less-ornamented females. We also conduct a laboratory experiment to show that female ornaments are condition-dependent and honestly signal reproductive potential. Overall, these results are consistent with the predictions of a sex-independent version of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis, as male preference for female ornaments correlates with fertility benefits.

Keywords: Syngnathidae coloration condition lek mating systems sexual selection.

2 - Behavior, mating systems and sexual selection

Behavior can be defined as anything that an individual does during its life, involving action in response to a stimulus. Eating behavior is stimulated by hunger sleeping or resting behavior is in response to fatigue escape is a response to attack and reproductive behavior is in response to physiological urges and stimulation by members of the opposite sex. Throughout the life of an individual insect it is behaving constantly in one way or another, making behavior a large and important subject.

Many behaviors are in response to external stimuli, part of the environment, making them ecologically relevant, and behavioral ecology is an important part of ecological understanding. Understanding much of behavior results from the study of how species are adapted to the problems of survival and reproduction, and how natural selection shapes the trajectory of a lineage through the costs and benefits, the opportunities and constraints, of any particular genetic and phenotypic change in that lineage.

If you are interested in a career in ecology, resource management, public health or environmental technology, you are in the right spot. You can choose different paths in the major, to focus on ecology and organisms or social and ethical issues surrounding environmental sciences.

Field Botany

Field-based exploration of plant taxonomy, anatomy, evolutionary and ecological relationships and quantitative sampling techniques of plants found in Iowa and the Midwest.

Principles of Ecology w/lab

A study of the interactions between organisms and their environments. Topics to be covered include biomes, plant and animal adaptations, populations, interactions between populations, community structure, ecosystems and large scale ecological processes.

Behavioral Ecology

A study of the behavior of animals in relation to their ecology. Topics include mating systems, sexual selection, parental care, co-evolution, spacing, foraging, communication and social behavior.

4-Year Plan for Success

What courses would I take in this major? What would my four-year plan include? What opportunities outside of the classroom would benefit me?

4.4.2E: Mating Systems and Sexual Selection - Biology

Plagiarism-free Papers Producing unique texts is what drives our service. We check every paper for plagiarism before sending it you. Our bespoke software ensures that what you receive hasn’t been published before. Our developers keep the scanner updated with the latest algorithms. Thus, it runs with great accuracy without any downtimes. We give you the confidence to subject your paper to the scrutiny of course tools, like Turnitin.

Loyalty Discounts We reward return customers with discounts. And not just any discounts – we increase the price cuts depending on how much you spend over time. Let’s say you pay for more than 10 orders for the duration of a course. We’ll give you 15% off on all the other papers you order. It is that simple.

Free Revisions Our team of writers will make your experience fulfilling by getting it right the first time. But, where necessary, you could always ask for some tweaks. Since we’re as obsessed with perfection as you are, we will revise your paper until you are fully satisfied with it. And, if you don’t introduce new requirements or ask for a change of approach, we will not charge you anything extra.

Money Back Guarantee We give 100% money-back guarantees on all orders. If a paper falls way below your expectations, you’re entitled to a full refund. You could even get a partial refund if you raise concerns about quality, and we substantiate them.

Safe & Secure Payments We work with PayPal to ensure that you pay in a safe and secure way. We don’t get any access to your card details when you pay through PayPal. This approach protects you against online fraud and identity theft. It also gives you an added layer of security by making the transactions reversible.

Round-the-clock Support The Support Team is the main interface between us and you. Thus, we keep our communication lines open at all hours of the day, every day. The service is friendly and responsive to make your experience as smooth as possible. Call, chat, or email – we will not keep you waiting.

Plagiarism free We at take the uniqueness of every delivered paper seriously. We consistently check for plagiarism before the papers are sent to you. This ensures the originality of our writers’ work. Each paper is run with a robust and up to date specially designed plagiarism software tool. Furthermore, our plagiarism software tool is consistently upgraded to ensure that it detects plagiarized texts with high certainty and accuracy.

Rewarding discounts for returned customers We have elaborated a loyalty system where your lifetime discount grows progressively depending on the overall amount spent with us. If you want to defer more than 10 papers to us - you will get 15% discount on all the next papers. The more you order - the bigger discount you get. No strings attached!

Free Revisions Perfection can take multiple efforts, and it is especially significant to know that you can request free corrections according to your comments if you dislike the paper, or want it to be refined. No additional cost is applied for your requests, as long as they are not new or contradictory ones.

Money Back Guarantee If you see that the paper is not completed per your guidelines, you are eligible for a 100% money-back before you accept the paper, or a partial refund for whatever quality concerns.

Secure Payments and Confidentiality We cooperate with PayPal, where you can pay both with your balance and credit/debit card. PayPal is a secure payment method that we work exclusively with to avoid any possible fraud..

Round-the-clock Support The Support Team is the main interface between us and you. Thus, we keep our communication lines open at all hours of the day, every day. The service is friendly and responsive to make your experience as smooth as possible. Call, chat, or email – we will not keep you waiting.

Watch the video: Sexual Selection - The Basics. Emphasis on Fishes. Koaw Nature (May 2022).


  1. Gail

    I think I make mistakes.

  2. Burley

    Incomparable phrase, I like it a lot :)

  3. Daviel

    I would like to encourage you to visit a site that has a lot of information on the subject that interests you.

  4. Mieko

    Now everything is clear, many thanks for the information.

Write a message